Super Size Me; American Documentary Film

Super Size Me.

Super Size Me
Super Size Me

Analyse the documentary Super Size Me from an ethical point of view.

Put emphasis on the:
  • relation between shareholders, executives and customers;
  • pros and cons of affordable food.

In case there is some information about the literature, this is meant to be a starting point.

In case there is no information about literature, please start with an investigation of the relevant information a corporation has put on the internet.

APA Guidelines, 100% Plagiarism free.
5 Pages without literature and front page.

Story line

Several legal suits have been brought against McDonald’s Restaurants that they are knowingly selling food that is unhealthy.

Some of the court decisions have stated that the plaintiffs would have a claim if they could prove that eating the food every day for every meal is dangerous.

As such, documentarian Morgan Spurlock conducts an unscientific experiment using himself as the guinea pig: eat only McDonald’s for thirty days, three meals a day.

If he is asked by the clerk if he would like the meal super sized, he has to say yes.

And by the end of the thirty days, he will have had to have eaten every single menu item at least once.

Before starting the experiment, he is tested by three doctors – a general practitioner, a cardiologist and a Gastroenterology – who pronounce his general health to be outstanding.

They will also monitor him over the thirty days to ensure that he is not placing his health into irreparable damage.

He also consults with a dietitian/nutritionist and an exercise… Written by Huggo

Film Analysis Essay Writings

Film Analysis Essay.

Film Analysis Essay
Film Analysis Essay

Writing a Film Analysis Essay

  • An Inconvenient Truth
  • Supersize Me
  • Bowling for Columbine
  • Who Killed the Electric Car?
  • A Normal Life

In these films, very specific claims are made on information, inferences, and judgments. Do you agree? What is your analysis of the main argument’s strengths and weaknesses?

 If you do agree with the film’s conclusions, what information, inferences, or judgments carry the most weight with you? Why those?

As you write, you may include other information that you bring to this topic. What are the inferences and judgments you rely on as you take a position on the topic?

 If you do not agree, then explain why in terms of the information provided and/or the inferences and judgments made.

What’s “wrong” with or about any of them? What information do you have that counters the information cited in the movie? What do your inferences and judgments lead you to believe is the truth about the issue?

Your essay should be no less than two full pages in length, roughly 500 words. If you use outside sources, please cite and reference them according to APA standards.